Revisited overview

GEOPOLITICAL sense….

And John Mearsheimer makes the point, that USA need Russia on its side if in the future China becomes excessively aggressive. The foolish Biden Johnson war has put Russia and China together and its created Brics …
There is no two fools who are more foolish than Biden and Johnson…
Look what they have done to the world, and worse still look what they did to Ukraine.
Thus Trump is geopolitically correct to work with Russia for the sake of future security for the world….
The mainstreamers are geopolitically clueless full of sentiments and have no idea of how powerful China is becoming..
We are not saying China is an enemy…but geopolitical balances should be sorted .

History.

One should ask in which way were the Ukrainians restrained by Russia before this conflict , and in which way were the Russians being constrained , both politically and economically . John Mearsheimer speaks of the USA and EU forbidding trade or cultural and political ties with the Russia by the new government that they helped put in place , the historic ties between the two countries forced apart , by those who sought to destabilise Russia and further spread libertine conglomerate monopolies…within Russia.
What Putin calls the causes of the conflict that mainstreamers and mainstream don’t care of , indeed Putin spent years ,before the conflict to warn of increasing military and political money being spent by the West, in their Ukraine project .He was ignored by the USA , who began these events.
Thus history must be looked at , not ignored .
China in Mexico, China in Belgium with military and political money ?
President Trump has always been correct to try to avert a war with Russia, the war that Biden and Johnson stated and that Clinton began a long time ago thanks to his Nato expansion orders …
WW3 is a reality in the minds of the foolish…
Geopolitical negotiations are in the minds of the wise …

Who is more intelligent..?

Trump who picks a fight with a lesser adversary…in neuclar terms ..?..Iran ….although he should not have ….

Or UK and EU who picks a fight with a country holding vast stocks and will never give up their historical cultures or way of life …..?

Here is some hard facts ….

Russia has roughly 5,400 to 5,500 total nuclear warheads (with about 1,500 to 1,700 deployed), whereas Europe (specifically France and the United Kingdom, the continent’s only two nuclear-armed states) has a combined total of around 515 nuclear warheads (about 290 for France and 225 for the UK..

Outdated..

The USA is not the most powerful military nation in the world , its an outdated outfit ..at most …..
When the world wakes up to the unipolar world we may find some peace , geopolitical realistic negotiations can bring peace ..
Not illusions. You can’t break human spirit, no one will surrender…..so negotiations is the only route .

http://www.thevedicspectator.com