We can admit that relying on our limited imperfect senses perfect knowledge may not be arrived out …

In Nyaya, the word  Bhrama refers to an erroneous notion, illusion, or misconception of a particular observation.
For instance, when a Darwinian objectively sees that codes and informational exchanges take place in the building of every  body of every species , their  illogical notion is this is not a code pe say . They dismiss any argument or logical conclusion that the origins of these coded systems within the genome are  more than likely stemming from a code maker , intelligence and intelligence mean a conscious being .

Vipralipsa is another part of imperfection. It means the desire to cheat this is also discussed in Nyaya.
The Atheistic Darwinian knows  very well what the implications of codes and design are .They would have to concede to  deliberate order and design within our universal order . Richard Dawkins also recognised these universal and obvious hints within nature, such as perfect math ,symmetry , as well as dna  codes and deliberate order just about everywhere . However, he tells that although design is prevalent in nature , students have to ignore this design if they want to study science.

Karanapatava means the limited nature of our senses in Nyaya.

This means the greatest minds and intellects could apply themselves their whole lives, but still be unable to understand the inconceivable nature of even one living cell .  The consciousness is limited , and the complexity of nature is beyond comprehension and unlimitedly so .  How one consciousness could be the  source  of everything is mind-boggling, to say the least . The Darwinian has mistakingly  given up on dualism and attempted to  replace it with scientific materialism, the world of chance, and random events. This is due to their failure to understand due limited capability. The obvious difference between consciousness and matter is also ignored by a Darwinian.
Another example…
Arthapatti means to infere a cause because of a result. The example given , that someone is overweight , but during the day, you never see them eat , so one concludes at night they must over eat .
In the Darwinian case, just because an ape has some features of humans , they conclude and teach that apes are our  ancestors. However, intelligence is the most important part of a human, giving us various skills of many kinds . The brain of the octopus or the dolphin or whale, along with their complex communications, are far more advanced than apes ..
So why assume something like Einstein brain has come from a chimp ?.The reality and logical conclusion should be we are experiencing throughout the entire ranges of the species of life , similar engineering and more than likely the same engineer.

http://www.thevedicspectator.com

---