Herein lies the problem for the snobby academic with handfuls of PHD s , and the citations he  writes , as if absolute authority,  and they’ll say ,” you can’t possibly understand how my speculations are coming into highly evolved  mind and  intellect, and how much closer I am to real science than you ,”

You see they don’t accept William Paley and his assessment that if a watch was found in the long grass , by a jungle Dweller 100 odd years ago , the person finding it would immediately cry ,wow who made that ,what is its function ,how was it made .?

The jungle dweller accepts the logical answer and won’t think , perhaps over billions of billions of years heat melted rocks and formed metal ore , and the wind and rain shaped the metal during the next billion years and during massive historic storms the pieces of metal were shaped further and volcanic eruptions and earthquake engulfed the parts ,and then after billions of further years bit by bit  and by random events the parts of the chiseled metal were situated close together and further storm’s and erosion meant everything amalgamated and this perfectly well explained  what could have happened and how the  watch came to be .

The Darwinian narrative of an unguided mutational process , is like someone contemplating intellectually by speculations how a watch after billions and billions of years could have formed,  and to accept the easy answer, of someone created it is a sign of weak intelligence But the Darwinian can not give any indication as to how the information evolved in the genome or how the 42 million protein molecules in each cell  might have evolved by a gradual process and how  self selection takes place

One thing they do know the human body, and its  brain  , far out completes , anything anyone can engineer and this machine self replicates , the thesis,  that it could not have been engineered by an intelligent source , because its just too incomprehensible,  is met with the antithesis,  that where there is smoke ,there is fire , that where you see codes and information you assume codemaker , the synthesis of the two concepts is to understand what Einstein said .

Science without religion is lame

Religion without science is blind .