Professor John Mearsheimer and Jonathan Sachs , annalise the situation well , Nato expansion is a bad move , a move USA and EU and UK insist on making , and so is unlimited support for Israel in its mass murder policies 400 dead women and children for 5 Hamas fighters is a Churchillian method,  so Israel think , the Israeli Netanyahu quoted Dresden and Churchill at the beginning of his slaughter campaign.

But when push comes to shove , and  USA EU and UK supplying military equipment and expertise and probably military experts guiding and operating drones into Russian territory , and now stealing money from Russian accounts to give to Ukraine,  and the USA plan is to increase these operations , under Harris . BUT, if Russia feels the effects too much , John Mearsheimer thinks it won’t retreat but could be left with no other alternative than a localised nuclear strike . Russia has no intentions of having USA and Nato on its door step , as much as USA would not want China and its military in Mexico.

We must remember history and warnings from history,  and ignore left leaning Liberal political parties that want to spread aggressive militant democracy.

Here is the warning .

In 1997, 50 prominent foreign policy experts, including former senators, military leaders, and diplomats, sent an open letter to then-President Bill Clinton outlining their opposition to NATO expansion. “It is a policy error of historic proportions,” they wrote.

Conservative political commentator Pat Buchanan wrote in his 1999 book ‘A Republic, Not an Empire’, “By moving NATO onto Russia’s front porch, we have scheduled a twenty-first-century confrontation.”

The current director of the CIA, William Burns, said in 2008 that for Russia, accession to NATO is the brightest of all red lines.”

“I have not yet found anyone who would consider Ukraine in NATO as something other than a direct challenge to Russia’s interests,” he said.