Some atheistic scientific thinkers are using computer statistical analysis with mathematical modelling , along with their subjective speculations , that they call reasoning , and are stating that given enough time chemicals can self assemble in organised selection methods , one person gave a comparison to a tumble dryer , just throwing things around , until magically creating perfect chemical bonds and perfect molecular structures . Such scientific thinkers , who are not particularly educated in computer modelling or statistical mathematics are fooling some of the innocent public by using their speculative calculations and even suggest chemical sequencing are the ultimate source of consciousness and the constructions of all the millions of body parts . Basically they are assuming thd DNA coding and the perfect information structures forming protein machines that supervise the way the body is built, are just chance events, but , that keep repeating themselves.
One might presume they are saying a million monkeys on a million typewriters for a million years will produce by chance a replica of one of Shakespeares plays . Problem is the word “might ” has been deliberately “upgraded ” , by rascal some science community members , in the language of the Darwinian , at least when it comes to the uneducated public, might is upgraded to “it is now more or less proved” such self selection is happening . ” we see it happening ” in our mathematical modelling , “self selection and biological evolution is now a reality .” NO NEED OF ANY INTELLIGENT FORSIGHT or God .
FURTHER , recent experiments were carried out , taking a string of already existing RNA and slicing it in three , and adding already existing parts of RNA , and trying to get this to self replicate , they managed a 1 % purity level , instead of natures 100% purity level , that enables self replicating to take place , Such 1% purity is no substitute for the so called primordial soup….everything must be 100% molecular structures , otherwise they break up .
http://www.thevedicspectator.com
What they don’t tell you is that its wishful thinking based on faulty computer mathematical modelling and statistics calculations that are unrealistic.
It’s only mathematical statistical experts and computer modellers that can easily see the inaccuracies of the work of such atheistic speculations of such Darwinian profs . using these techniques . AND it fools only those not familiar with statistics, mathematics, and computer modelling. or biological and chemical engineering.
