Luke Cassey from the intelligent design movement says ..
Critics wrongly charge that ID is just a negative argument against evolution, that ID makes no predictions, that it is a “god of the gaps” argument from ignorance, or that appealing to an intelligent cause means “giving up” or “stopping science.” These charges are misguided.
Ironically, when critics claim that research is not permitted to detect design because that would stop science, it is they who hold science back by preventing scientists from investigating the scientific theory of intelligent design. When researchers are allowed to infer intelligent agency as the best explanation for information-rich structures in nature, this opens up many avenues of discovery that are bearing good fruit in the scientific community.
Here is the option of Bhagavad-Gita. Spoken by Lord Krishna..
Chapter 9: The Most Confidential Knowledge
TEXT 10
mayadhyaksena prakrtih
suyate sa-caracaram
hetunanena kaunteya
jagad viparivartate
This material nature is working under My direction, O son of Kunté, and it is producing all moving and unmoving beings. By its rule this manifestation is created and annihilated again and again.
The founder of ISKCON AC Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada would have very much appreciated the work of the Discovery Institute in bringing relevant easy to understand scientific information to society at large .
The citations of the scientific community, full of subjectivity and not really addressing objective facts , when it comes to the origins of life that are pointed out by honest scientific community members , society as a whole owes them a great deal , they risk their scientific livelihoods , as academic circles seek to limit what they say and withdraw facilities.
The whole thrust and directions of civilised society will ultimately change when real science is presented because real science means intellgent design, nyaya logic explains what conclusions logically should be drawn .
